Twin DNA Differences

  by  |  March 17th, 2008  |  Published in All, Animals & Life Science, Health


 |  Stumble |  Share on Facebook |  Tweet This | 

Geneticists are discovering that identical twins don’t have identical DNA. As this ScienCentral News video explains, this surprising research could help scientists better understand genetic diseases in the rest of us.

Interviewees: Julia & Claire Calzonetti, Identical twin; Jan Dumanski, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Length: 1 min 26 sec
Produced by Joyce Gramza & Jessica Tanenbaum
Edited by Jessica Tanenbaum/Chris Bergendorff
Copyright © ScienCentral, Inc.

One Zygote, Two Genomes

For identical twins, the equation always has been simple: same egg + same sperm = same DNA. But new research from the American Journal of Human Genetics says this formula is not quite right. According to geneticist Jan Dumanski and his colleagues, identical twins don’t have matching DNA.

“In medical textbooks or in popular science books, it’s very often written that identical twins are identical also in the DNA,” says Dumanski. “And that’s not true. We are challenging this dogma by finding these small subtle but clearly detectable differences in the DNA of identical twins.”

Although researchers previously have documented a few, rare genetic differences between identical twins, Dumanski says such cases were considered exceptions. “It was, in the field, considered rather as a curiosity that they really differ. What we show is that these differences are actually very, very frequent,” he explains. “We basically see those differences in every twin pair we looked at so far.”

For their study, Dumanski and colleagues compared the genomes of 19 twin pairs using DNA chip technology. For some of their volunteer pairs, one twin had Parkinson’s disease while the other was healthy. Until now, scientists would attribute such a difference to environment rather than genetics. But Dumanski’s research shows genetics might play a role.

He found that while twin pairs had identical gene sequences, they differed in how many copies they had of certain genes. Recent research has shown that differences in gene copy number can be important to how our bodies function in health and disease.

Dumanski says that because of his team’s findings, the large existing body of twin studies might need some revision, and predicts their work will certainly influence future twin studies. Scientific studies of twins typically rely on the assumption that identical twins have identical DNA. Any characteristics the twins don’t share are therefore attributed to subtle differences in environment or life experience. But if twin DNA doesn’t match, then scientists will need to take that into account in assessing whether nature or nurture causes two twins to diverge.

“We definitely do not overturn the influence of the environment on the outside characteristics or traits of identical twins,” explains Dumanski. “We are just saying that this picture has to be a little modified—that we do have on top of environmental influences also genetics, which is important, or possibly important for development of the differences between identical twins,” he says.

Because identical twins do have identical gene sequences, Dumanski says they are still special. “Identical twins are very well aware that they are very special, that they are very interesting experiments that nature is doing for us,” he says. “And they are also well aware that possible differences in their outside characteristics might lead scientists to discover about disease predispositions. So they are very cooperative. I certainly would like to encourage all identical twins to continue these type of tight collaborations with scientists like me, in genetic research of common disorders.”

For example, if one twin has a version of the well-known BRCA1 gene that greatly increases the risk of breast cancer, the other twin has it too. While twins do have the same genes, the new study shows that twins don’t always have the same number of copies of those genes. That is, twin A could have three BRCA1 genes, while twin B only has one.

Dumanski says geneticists don’t yet have a good handle on the consequences of having different numbers of copies of certain genes because this area of research is so new. “We still don’t know how much exactly of those changes we have, not only between two identical twins, but also between two unrelated individuals,” he says.

For some genes, one copy is healthy, but too many copies cause disease. For other genes, people with very different copy numbers can all be healthy. Studying identical twins, Dumanski says, could help geneticists figure out which genes tend to duplicate and how these duplications arise. “These findings might be important for our future studies of disease predisposition” in twins and non-twins alike, he says.

Dumanski’s news might be a surprise for geneticists, but identical twins Claire and Julia Calzonetti have already accepted the fact that they’re not truly identical. Claire had her appendix removed, for one thing. But on the outside, the two women look pretty darn similar. They say people regularly mix them up, despite any genetic differences Claire and Julia may have.

Julia says, “People get really confused. They’re like, ‘What? What? I just said hi to you like five minutes ago and now she’s ignoring me.’ ” And Claire says she gets hugs from strangers who think she’s Julia. “You don’t know who to say hi to, because they’re like waiting for you to say hi, but you don’t know them,” says Claire.

If people could instantly scan Julia and Claire’s DNA, maybe they wouldn’t be so confused.

This research was published in the American Journal of Human Genetics on March 3, 2008 and was funded by the University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical School, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Children’s Cancer Foundation, the U.S. Army, and the Netherlands Genomics Initiative.


 |  Stumble |  Share on Facebook |  Tweet This | 


Responses

  1. Biology Lessons of the Holocaust | ScienCentral | Science Videos | Science News says:

    March 9th, 2009 at 4:13 pm (#)

    [...] Twin DNA Differences, 5.17.08 [...]

  2. Abortion? - Page 5 - ConflictingViews.com - Political forum, Discussion Board, Religious forum, forum's forum says:

    August 5th, 2009 at 3:37 pm (#)

    [...] of those genes. That is, twin A could have three BRCA1 genes, while twin B only has one." Twin DNA Differences | ScienCentral | Science Videos | Science News [...]

  3. Agnes Holbrook says:

    June 17th, 2011 at 2:05 am (#)

    Hi! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new apple iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Keep up the great work!

  4. Randall says:

    January 7th, 2012 at 6:09 am (#)

    I am an identical twin, our DNA matches perfectly. Explain this one. We are identical in every way, outside influences excluded.

  5. twinnie at ottawa says:

    January 23rd, 2012 at 1:07 pm (#)

    I’m now 83 yrs old with an identical twin sister. We were raised in a family with a brother five years older, a sister five years younger and a second brother 8 years younger and were totally dependent on each other for company all the way through public school. Our mother dressed us alike and expected us to be the same in every way. Being hard to tell apart through childhood and public school we were called ‘Twinnie’. My twin had a mastoid op when she was 5; I had an appendectomy when I was 16 and she had a lot of dental work done by the time she was 18. In high school she took ‘home-ec’ because of the art courses and I took the commercial courses which irritated our mother who eventually made her leave school and take an office job before graduating. She is more outgoing than I and was more artistic and a great seamstress and I was the knitter, crocheter and tatter! We were both interested in craft work and her home is always beautifully decorated. In my late 30′s I lost a lot of my hearing amd am now profoundly deaf; she developed m.s. in her late 30′s and we were part of a twin study into identical twins and m.s. Her neurologist at the clinic didn’t believe we were identical twins because our appearances had changed somewhat over the years. I have been interested in reading the results of these latest gene/DNA studies. Explains a lot.

  6. cheap sheng boots says:

    November 22nd, 2013 at 2:58 am (#)

    It is appropriate time to make some plans for the longer term
    and it’s time to be happy. I’ve learn this submit and if I may just I desire to recommend
    you some fascinating things or tips. Maybe you can write subsequent articles
    regarding this article. I want to learn even more issues about it!

    cheap sheng boots

  7. enjoy says:

    June 29th, 2014 at 8:10 am (#)

    Unquestionably consider that that you said. Your favourite reason appeared to be at
    the internet the simplest thing to understand of. I say
    to you, I certainly get annoyed at the same time as folks think about concerns that they plainly do not understand about.
    You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest and defined out the
    whole thing with no need side-effects , folks could take a signal.
    Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  8. iPad cases and covers says:

    December 7th, 2014 at 9:45 pm (#)

    If you were stranded on a desert island or stuck in traffic on I-80 and you could choose just one device, you would want an iPad. It offers the best content and features, though it costs more

  9. Sibling says:

    May 22nd, 2015 at 6:11 am (#)

    Identical twins too have different DNA. The codes mismatch at some level so one can get correct alleged father from DNA test of identical twins.

  10. Chanel iPhone 6 Cases says:

    October 13th, 2016 at 2:51 am (#)

    Looking back over the last six years of Apple’s financials, Milunovich found that the company’s stock tends to correlate better with the next 12 months of Apple’s results than with six months.

Leave a Response


Archives


Clicky Web Analytics